Skip to main content

Jevon's Paradox resolved by solar energy

Jevon's paradox  refers to occurs when technological progress or government policy increases the efficiency with which a resource is used (reducing the amount necessary for any one use), but the falling cost of use increases its demand, increasing, rather than reducing, resource use.  For example, increasing insulation in homes in England has led to people turning up their thermostats for greater comfort.  

It seems to me that this paradox is based on the notion of access to a scarce resource - e.g. coal or natural gas.  People who choose a more comfortable lifestyle for the same price doesn't seem paradoxical, but rather a free-market choice.  Unfortunately, the larger goal of reducing environmental damage from the fossil is not met.  People just use more of the resource.

Rivalrous resources are well suited to billing systems.  It's pretty simple for an organization to set up a paywall and a meter, add up the usage, and bill each customer for their depletion of the resource.  If person A buys a unit of fuel, person B can no longer have it, and they are rivals in a zero sum game, controlled by supply and demand. 

This model works very well for the oil and gas industry.  One just needs to look at the opulence of the Saudi or Qatari royal family and hangers-on to see how well it is working for them.

Solar energy, on the other hand, is non-rivalrous resource.  If I put solar panels on my roof to harvest energy from the sun, I am not taking anything away from my neighbor.  In fact, the more my neighbors collect solar energy, the lower the price of the energy due to economies of scale.  If I decide to install more panels to have a more comfortable temperature in my home, I'm not using up scarce resources, nor am I creating more pollution or environmental damage. There is no need for a paywall to measure out the suns energy to pay to a third party (as much as my local utility would love to do so).  I can install enough solar panels to power my vehicles, air conditioning/heating, lights, cooking, electronic devices, air quality control, and whatever else I wish.  I am free to adjust my thermostats to whatever temperature I wish, drive as many miles as I like, run landscape lighting to create a pleasant evening glow around my home, or whatever I like without causing any environmental damage or taking resources away from my neighbors.

Jevons paradox - that 


Popular posts from this blog

Retroinformation ideas

Here are some ideas that I've been throwing around over the years. Vernor Vinge and I used to talk about these things at our lunches the Greek restaurant in Sorrento Valley.  Retroinformation: Information that can be communicated between different eras and scales.  Wormhole Transport Protocol (WTP) an information transport layer that extends HTTP to allow endpoint servers to be in different eras or scale. HTTP with parameters for era and time domain. Information is filtered via a CASER mechanism, which blocks information that is not self-consistent.  Channels may open up between scales, such as quantum and macro scales, or ants and their ant colony, or worms and their ecosystem. Wormhole Transport Markup Language (WTML).  A language used to describe the communication channel to communicate between endpoints using the WTP servers.  This language protocol will start out simply, and evolve as the level of trust and consistency increases. Era: a time domain, describing the time domain

Underwriter''s lab approval of DIY Box Fans

UL has reviewed the Corso Box fans and found them to be safe from overheating. The fan I bought at Home depot also had a thermal protection switch Underwriter's Lab approval of DIY Box Fans "Across all fan/filter test scenarios, the most notable temperature increases were observed at the motor and motor windings. However, all measured temperatures fell below the maximum acceptable thresholds defined by the market safety standard for electric fans (UL 507). Exterior surfaces that can come into direct contact with people remained below 36 °C, which is below the first-degree burn potential of 47.5 °C. Further, an extreme scenario where both the front and back of the fan were blocked for an extended period of 7 hours did not pose any observable fire hazards. And after an initial rise, temperature remained steady throughout the test."

Visionaries and GPT advice - raw transcript

This is a raw transcript of my chat with OpenGPT 4.0. my input is shown in these black blocks while GPT's response is in the lighter sections. Lots of interesting tidbits, but I think it shows some of the conversational power of the technology. I'll edit and summarize this later... there have been many visionaries in the past who studied ways that humanity could lift itself up with improved intelligence. I am looking for these thinkers, and would like to learn how GPT-4 opens new avenues to explore their thinking using AI. Who were these thinkers? Many visionaries throughout history have explored ways to enhance human intelligence and elevate our collective understanding. Some prominent thinkers in this area include: Francis Bacon (1561-1626): An English philosopher and scientist, Bacon is known for developing the scientific method. He believed that knowledge could be systematically pursued and organized to improve human life. René Descartes (1596-1650): A French philosop